- This topic has 66 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 1 month ago by
Robert Varga.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 17, 2004 at 11:00 pm #212494
support-jeffMemberAs the developer behind much of the hibernate features in ME, I will definitely vote for Spring as well. My limited experience in the Spring+Hibernate realm has been very much a positive one. Makes a lot of the complexity of coding Hibernate (not necessarily the mapping part, though) go away. Gotta love IoC!
August 17, 2004 at 11:16 pm #212498
Riyad KallaMemberI think its safe to say with this much popularity and the developer that will probably implement it voting for it… it will make it in 😀
August 17, 2004 at 11:26 pm #212500
support-jeffMemberHey, I have surprizingly little pull in the area of priorities. Don’t place too much faith in me! 😉
August 18, 2004 at 6:18 am #212530
Andrew FreemanMemberHow does the Spring integration fit in with the priorities? Actually, what are the priorities? Are these listed anywhere?
August 18, 2004 at 9:23 am #212560
Riyad KallaMemberAndy,
Until we stabalize 3.8 I don’t know that we are even thinking about our next release. But from this poll I would say that Spring support has positioned itself pretty high on the list of TODO items.August 18, 2004 at 11:45 am #212625
cbredesenMemberI voted NO only because I would like to see existing “partial” features completed first. Actually, I think Spring integration makes sense. Not before JSP 2.0 is fully supported.
September 1, 2004 at 12:22 pm #214230
Ben EngMemberI voted no, because I am using JDO (the MVCSoft implementation) in combination with Tapestry, so Hibernate does not interest me.
September 1, 2004 at 4:18 pm #214278
grfyljqMember@jetpen wrote:
I voted no, because I am using JDO (the MVCSoft implementation) in combination with Tapestry, so Hibernate does not interest me.
Hibernate support is already there so the forum topic is somewhat of a misnomer. This is more about Spring integration. If you don’t know anything about Spring – it’s a controller framework that implements dependency injection, which allows you to freely switch out the persistance (or view) layer very easily since the container and not code handles dependencies.
Therefore this is for anyone wanting the option/flexibilty to easily switch out Hibernate (JDO, etc…) or Struts (Webwork, Tapestry, Swing, etc…) with whatever they want at any time for any reason. Think of the possibities (one of which MyEclipse can more easily add support for the persistance / view layer of your choice in the future).
I’m sure I probably didn’t do a perfect job of explaining this – but if you want to know more, you should read Martin Fowler’s paper/blog on Dependency Injection for a better explanation.
September 1, 2004 at 4:23 pm #214279
jsentsMember@awf999 wrote:
See the https://appfuse.dev.java.net/ for lots of Hibernate, Struts, Spring, etc integration.
I too would like to see appfuse as an optional starter project. I have been working on getting a appfuse project started inside MyEclipse and running on Jboss 4.
I am very impressed with the features that continue to be add. Keep up the great work.
September 10, 2004 at 7:00 pm #215019
Kurtis WilliamsMemberI’m a huge fan of Spring. It’s revolutionized my middle-tier development. MyEclipse support would be fantastic.
September 14, 2004 at 9:33 am #215170
snpeMemberI use Spring, too, but I don’t know what ME can do yet (except xml editing and validation)
regards
September 15, 2004 at 8:29 am #215236
Lee HarringtonMemberI’d like a “hibernate/struts” wizard that will create a complete CRUD set. A list form, and add/edit form with delete button, and all the rest of the code to tie everything together.
Lee
September 16, 2004 at 11:24 pm #215404
JoaoMemberI cast for Spring integration as weel. Springs is helping a lot on JSF project I am developting.
September 26, 2004 at 3:11 am #215985
java-consultingMemberA big +1 for Spring in all its glory (but _not_ AppFuse, per se).
Re: “it would be nice when using Hibernate if the config stuff could be located inside a Spring config file instead of a hibernate.properties or hibernate.hbm.xml file”… one still requires separate “hibernate.cfg.xml” file for certain purposes.
September 30, 2004 at 2:53 pm #216553
jpwinansMemberHey ME Team,
Yes, Spring has revolutionized not only my J2EE developmental process, but maintance as well. And as a huge fan of ME, I would LOVE to see Spring automation included.
I’m in the process of having my entire corporation switch over to Eclipse with ME, and it is now basing much of its architecture on Spring. So having Spring automation in ME would be a big selling point for the rest of the developers.Thanks,
James -
AuthorPosts