- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 6 months ago by arnor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
arnorMemberhi to all,
I can use Oracle jsf implementation with MyEclipse 3.8? and in 4.0?
may be just a jar switch? 🙂Many thanks in advance
Regards Lorenzo
Michael FlanakinMemberTheoretically, yes. Just add JSF capabilities and either don’t specify the JSF type to use or replace those JARs with Oracle’s. I can’t remember if you’re forced to specify Sun or MyFaces or not. Either way, give it a shot. I’m fairly confident that you can replace the JARs with no problems. I don’t think ME cares what JARs you use, it simply tries to help you out by putting them where it thinks they need to be. For instance, after I set mine up, I moved the JARs and everything still works fine 🙂 I am using 4.0 M1, tho.
Best of luck!
Riyad KallaMemberI’m fairly confident that you can replace the JARs with no problems. I don’t think ME cares what JARs you use, it simply tries to help you out by putting them where it thinks they need to be. For instance, after I set mine up, I moved the JARs and everything still works fine 🙂 I am using 4.0 M1, tho.
Flanakin is exactly right, we just try and help out. I would like to add that if you navigate to Window > Prefs > MYEclipse > Project Capabilities > JSF, you can remove all the JARs we ship and just add your own. These will be added when you add “project caps”.
Michael FlanakinMemberBased on that, it’d be nice to add, edit, and/or remove the JSF implementations. Perhaps even setup a directory structure where people could simply point to it and it’d recognize the JARs/TLDs for the specified implementation. This could work like Eclipse’s Product Configuration works (you have to have an “eclipse” directory with “features” and “plugins” subdirectories and a “.eclipseextension” file). This would make the JSF implementations a little more extensible. For this purpose, it could be like…
MyJsfImpl - lib/*.jar - .meextension <-- metadata about JSF implementation (i.e. name, JARs, TLDs) - *.tld
Just an idea 🙂
Riyad KallaMemberBased on that, it’d be nice to add, edit, and/or remove the JSF implementations. Perhaps even setup a directory structure where people could simply point to it and it’d recognize the JARs/TLDs for the specified implementation.
Funny, I was discussing this with one of the managment as you typed this out, I’ll mash all the thoughts together into one cohesive report, I’ll even add characters and plot twists.
Michael FlanakinMemberDon’t forget the guy in the red shirt!
(No, I’m not a trekkie… I swear!)
arnorMembermany thank to all for the answes.
regards Lorenzo -
AuthorPosts