- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
public class EmployeeBean implements EntityBean {
Not creating entitybean as Abstract class. I have to modify class signature after code generation to:
public abstract class EmployeeBean implements EntityBean {
I’m using 4.0M2 release.
If you are using CMP, the Bean implementation class is supposed to be abstract. Because the appserver will extend your bean implementation and provide the real implementation. So is there any problem in just make your EmployeeBean class abstract?
Sorry I was not selecting the option in “Select the type of the EJB CMP1.1 CMP2.x BMP” because by default both CMP1.x and CMP2.x were selected.
It doesn’t generate abstract entity is this case. but if you select any of the CMP option it generates the code properly.
@krajnish wrote:
Sorry I was not selecting the option in “Select the type of the EJB CMP1.1 CMP2.x BMP” because by default both CMP1.x and CMP2.x were selected.
This was an issue with the EJB Entity bean wizard in 4.0M2. This is already fixed in our internal builds and will be fixed in the 4.0M3 release.
