Really ?, I did not see anything in the templates for handling JDBC connections.
I’m sorry I don’t understand this – are you talking about generation of JDBC code or you were expecting the reverse engineering process to be specified in the template?
A suggestion/request for 5.x is to allow a user to specify additional template files that will get processed.
This is on the cards for sure. I’m not sure of the timeline yet, but we will definitely do this.
Best,
Brian.